000 03533nam a22004454i 4500
001 vtls002911583
003 ES-BaIT
005 20211104062521.0
008 201223s2018 xxk|||||||||| 001 0 eng c
010 _a2911583
020 _a9780198807728
035 _a.b72255018
039 9 _a202012231009
_balvarezrb
_y202012231008
_zalvarezrb
040 _aES-TaURV
_bcat
_erda
_cES-TaURV
080 _a793
100 1 _aSchlapbach, Karin,
_eautor
_9154444
245 1 4 _aThe Anatomy of dance discourse :
_bliterary and philosophical approaches to dance in the later Graeco-Roman world /
_cKarin Schlapbach
250 _aFirst edition
264 1 _aOxford :
_bOxford University Press,
_c2018
300 _ax, 339 pàgines ;
_c24 cm
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _asense mediació
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolum
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
500 _aÍndex
520 _a"Within the newly thriving field of ancient Greek and Roman performance and dance studies, The Anatomy of Dance Discourse offers a fresh and original perspective on ancient perceptions of dance. Focusing on the second century CE, it provides an overview of the dance discourse of this period and explores the conceptualization of dance across an array of different texts, from Plutarch and Lucian of Samosata, to the apocryphal Acts of John, Longus, and Apuleius. The volume is divided into two Parts: while the second Part discusses ekphraseis of dance performance in prose and poetry of the Roman imperial period, the first delves more deeply into an examination of how both philosophical and literary treatments of dance interacted with other areas of cultural expression, whether language and poetry, rhetoric and art, or philosophy and religion. Its distinctive contribution lies in this juxtaposition of ancient theorizations of dance and philosophical analyses of the medium with literary depictions of dance scenes and performances, and it attends not only to the highly encoded genre of pantomime, which dominated the stage in the Roman empire, but also to acrobatic, non-representational dances. This twofold nature of dance sparked highly sophisticated reflections on the relationship between dance and meaning in the ancient world, and the volume defends the novel claim that in the imperial period it became more and more palpable that dance, unlike painting or sculpture, could be representational or not: a performance of nothing but itself. It argues that dance was understood as a practice in which human beings, whether as dancers or spectators, are confronted with the irreducible reality of their own physical existence, which is constantly changing, and that its way to cognition and action is physical experience." -- Contracoberta
650 7 _aDansa
_zGrècia
_2lemac
_9154445
650 7 _aDansa
_zRoma
_2lemac
_9154446
650 7 _aDansa
_xFilosofia
_2
_956578
650 7 _aDansa
_zRoma
_xHistòria
_2lemac
_9154447
650 7 _aDansa
_xAspectes antropològics
_956572
650 7 _aDansa en la literatura
_2lemac
_975320
650 7 _aEurítmica
_2lemac
_964277
650 7 _aCivilització clàssica
_2lemac
_9154448
650 7 _aCivilització grecoromana
_2lemac
_9154449
907 _a.b72255018
_b23-12-20
_c19-11-18
_d19-11-18
_em
_fa
_g-
_heng
_ixxk
_j0
_k0
940 _aCVA27
949 _AVIRTUAITEM
_D10040
_G10040
_X1
_61900081466
_a793 SCH
998 _aVIRTUA
998 _aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0350*0400*0800*1000*2450*2500*2640*3000*3360*3370*3380*5200*5000*6500*6501*6502*6503*6504*6505*6506*6507*6508*9070*9400*9992
999 _c130449
_d130449